Healing Diets for Autism

This is also from my inbox — it’s what got me thinking about autism and Stan Kurtz again.

San Francisco, December 18, 2009 – Nourishing Hope, an autism wellness advocacy company in San Francisco, today announced that the company will be hosting the first annual Autism: Hope in Action Conference on January 30, 2010 at the South San Francisco Conference Center from 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM. The event is sponsored by Neocate, a leading producer of nutritionally complete medical foods for children with autism.

“The San Francisco Bay Area has been severely impacted by the autism epidemic that has exploded worldwide,” says Julie Matthews – President of Nourishing Hope and Autism Nutrition Consultant.  “With over 50,000 childhood cases in the area, parents are seeking answers from pediatricians, autism medical specialists, nutritionists and other wellness professionals in order to help their children reach their full potential.  The big news is that some parents are “recovering” their children so they are able to attend regular grade school classes, function on a daily basis and, in some cases, see their autism diagnosis reversed.  We know these are strong claims in the face of an epidemic where “researchers” have not yet uncovered the cause or cure for autism – but they are very true, none-the-less.”

To help spread the word about how suffering children and parents can potentially find relief; on January 30th, proactive parents will join together and learn how to take better, and more results-oriented, control of their child’s autism treatment at the first annual Autism: Hope in Action Conference – www.autismhopeinaction.com.  The one-day conference will focus on proven, evidentiary treatment protocols that are currently being used to effectively treat and heal children from some and/or all of the devastating effects of autism.

Autism: Hope in Action will feature Dr. Kurt Woeller, Medical Director – Stillpoint Center for Integrative Medicine; Julie Matthews – President of Nourishing Hope and Autism Nutrition Consultant; and Stan Kurtz, CEO – revitaPOP, researcher and a father who has recovered his son from autism.

Presentations will focus on current physician-recommended medications that are effectively being used to treat autism along with essential supplements, necessary special autism diets and nutrition changes required for healing.  Parents will be introduced to autism as a whole-body disorder as is the case with the majority of diagnosed children. They will learn the stunning details of what is happening inside their child’s body and how the brain of the child with autism is impacted and impaired by activity in the gut and other organs.

Parents will gain a firm understanding from Dr. Woeller and Julie Matthews on how they can immediately help their children and ensure that they are receiving the safest and most effective treatment options available. Today’s treatment program includes medications, autism-specific supplements and special diets.  Parents will be instructed on how to take action alongside their healthcare providers so their children can develop better speech, gain cognitive ability, sleep better and ultimately heal internally.

According to Dr. Kurt Woeller, “I’ve treated hundreds of children with autism. Routinely, those who are getting better have parents who are fully engaged and add medication, supplements and implement an autism diet alongside their behavior therapy classes. As an autism-focused physician, I encourage parents to take advantage of every safe healing treatment opportunity available to their child. Until researchers isolate a cause and determine a cure for autism, parents and physicians must partner to help each child reach their full potential. Parents are seeing great improvement in the health of their children as integrative autism treatment options are expanded.”

As equally important to the medical treatment education at the conference, parents will learn from a parent who, like thousands reporting around the world, has applied multiple autism treatments to his child’s healing plan and has seen great improvement in his son’s autism symptoms list.  Stan Kurtz’ son was diagnosed with autism at a young age and is now a fully functioning, thriving young boy.  Stan has spent years as a parent researcher and managed his son’s integrative medical treatments.  He shares his story with parents to provide hope, encouragement and inspire action.

People attending the event will be able to ask speakers questions about treatment plan details, implementation and how to become the “champion” of their child’s medical treatments as they work with their own physicians, nutritionists, other family members, schools and other recommended therapy programs to expedite the healing process.

Additional event sponsors include OxyHealth, Houston Enzymes, New Beginnings Nutritionals, and Great Plains Laboratory.

Autism:  Hope in Action will be held January 30, 2010 at the South San Francisco Conference Center from 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM.  Event information can be explored at www.AutismHopeInAction.com

Put a price on carbon

Hi friends, here’s another one from ye olde inbox!

This is from Accountability-Central.com.  Happy reading!

TODAY: FOCUS ON RICHARD BARR,
FEATURED COMMENTATOR ON ACCOUNTABILITY-CENTRAL;
“CARBON: THE STAFF OF LIFE, THE BAIN OF DESTRUCTION”

His perspective: We will never make any progress on the fight against global warming until we put a price on carbon. There is no ESG and long-term sustainability factor more important than this one — and it is Corporate America that must step up to the plate. The corporate discharge of CO2 into the atmosphere will continue at alarming rates until corporations are given an incentive to cut their emissions.

Highlights: Richard Barr, a long-time “Socially Responsible Investment” (SRI) portfolio manager with First Affirmative Financial Network, is now a featured commentator on the Accountability-Central Web site (a resource for leaders in the corporate, social and public sector, and for journalists and editors). He comments today on the need for reconciliation in Washington despite the relative death of bipartisanship in Washington in setting stringent limits on carbon emissions. “Whatever President Barack Obama promised at the Copenhagen Conference, he must deliver through the U.S. Congress. This means one thing: reconciliation,” he says. Indeed, the New York Times in a just-published editorial, observed: “In order to deliver on his promises to reduce America’s greenhouse gas emissions by seventeen percent by 2020 and provide a chunk of $100 billion, Mr. Obama must persuade the Senate to approve a cap-and-trade bill — a huge task.”

“The search for a clean alternative must be incentivized to get power companies to build new and effective alternatives,” Barr writes. Concurrent with that, Barr sees cap and trade for carbon as a “must-have.” Adam Smith said “(Value) is adjusted…not by any accurate measure, but by the haggling and bargaining of the market, according to that sort of rough equality which, though not exact, is sufficient for carrying on the business of common life.” For this to happen as Smith correctly predicted a new “Value” must be created by cap-and-trade. Carbon must have a price.”

A cap-and-trade market, in theory, would benefit executives by giving them more certainty of future pollution costs and, therefore, investment decisions. Further, cap-and-trade would increase energy efficiency and renewable energy if Obama’s energy plan were enacted roughly as first presented. Even James Rogers, CEO of Duke Energy says the plan “won’t fulfill its potential unless there is a price on carbon.”

Quoting Socialfunds.com on his Accountability-Central.com posting, Barr writes: “…Shareowners of the companies [that are the largest sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions] have a responsibility to guide the companies in which they invest on a course to successful climate change mitigation. Shareowners can accomplish this goal by such means as insisting that companies improve their climate change disclosures; adopt strategies that address the risks of climate change; reduce costs through energy efficiency; and refrain from intervening in the adoption of climate change legislation…”

Barr’s other topics for commentary include the House of Representatives’ energy bill, which has companies in a spin; his call for more corporate transparency in the proposed climate change legislation; and an extensive look at the Most Sustainable companies (”Corporate America gets an ESG report card”) as assembled by Progressive Investor.”We here in America have something to learn from Corporate Europe,” he writes. The text of his column is available at Accountability-Central.com.

# # #

About Accountability-Central.com
Accountability-Central.com, published by the Governance & Accountability Institute, delivers important content through specific accountability “channels” or content silos on the topics of corporate governance, social investing, shareholder activism, financial reporting, ethics, and others.

About Governance & Accountability Institute
Governance & Accountability Institute, Inc. (www.ga-institute.com) provides timely news, actionable research and information, perspectives and opinion, reliable data, and customized advisory services to organizations, institutions and individuals seeking to do the right thing for the right reasonsINSIGHTS-edge is the Institute’s Web-based platform, available to subscribers and clients to identify, understand, track and engage with third party organizations that are shaping the capital markets and the corporate environment through their focus on key sustainability factors.

Diet and Autism (and other problems)

Friends, if you have a child diagnosed with autism, or if you have a friend or a relative who has a child diagnosed with autism, I implore you, before you read another word, to visit Stan Kurtz’s website and watch what he calls “recovery videos“, starting with his son Ethan.

I stumbled across Stan Kurtz about two years ago.  At the time, I was working with children with autism and was researching the disorder on my own after work one day.  Stan’s video flabbergasted me.  He showed video of his son displaying typical autism symptoms that anyone who’s ever seen autism before would immediately recognize.  Then he talks about how he “recovered” his son from autism, which he believes is a disease which is often related to diet.  Jenny McCarthy credits Stan for being one of the inspirations for recovering her own son from autism.

Stunned by the videos, I was excited to show them to my co-workers at school the next day.  Their reaction was very different from mine.  They were… shall we say, unimpressed.  They were convinced that either it was a hoax or that the child had been misdiagnosed with autism in the first place.

But I don’t believe either of those two things.

I’m no medical expert, but I’m smart enough to understand that once people have a certain paradigm, they aren’t willing to change that paradigm.  When it comes to developmental disorders such as autism, speech delay, and other types of delay, I believe that people have a certain paradigm, based mostly in our zeitgeist of reductionistic science, in which everything comes from DNA or a static brain that does not change or interact with the rest of the body.  This paradigm is king, and few people are willing to challenge it.

From Chronically Ill to Fit as a Fiddle

Stan Kurtz’s videos were some of the reasons I started my own experimentation with diet.  As I’ve mentioned on this blog before, I used to be chronically ill.  Every winter, I would get sick with respiratory infections around September, and not fully recover until about April.  If you graphed my health each winter, with “zero” as healthy and “ten” as really, really incapacitated, I fluctuated between ten and about two, but I never felt 100% well.

I assumed it was just my DNA.  My mother and father both have asthma (or at least, that’s what they’ve been diagnosed with).  My mother in particular suffers from chronic bronchitis, which she gets each winter (sound familiar?).  My dad has allergies to just about everything, from cats and pollen to his mother’s house (don’t tell grandma).

I assumed I was like them, and I was just doomed to be sick all the time.

Remember that I’m vegetarian?  And that I used to be a lazy vegetarian?  Well, a doctor friend of mine got suspicious about the paradigm I had about my health, and one day she dragged me into her office and had some blood work done on me.  Not surprisingly, I was anemic.  Quite anemic.  She put me on iron and a prescription strength nasal spray, and I got better.  Fast.

Supplements are a Pain

But supplements and nasal sprays are a pain, and I’ve never been good about taking things regularly (there’s my lazy streak again).  I didn’t want to be on supplements and steroid nasal sprays forever.

I went back to Stan Kurtz.  If what Stan learned applied to autism, what else might it apply to?

I researched raw foods, and diets of all types.  My health got better.  I cut back on iron, and I stopped using the nasal spray almost completely.  My health stayed better.

Today I’m proud to report that in two years, all I had a cold for about three days — and that was after two weeks of camping in damp conditions.  But that’s it — no more chronic respiratory infections.  Now, I look at my parents and their assumptions about their own health.  I wonder how many problems they could solve through diet changes alone?

I wish I could help my mom and dad, but they think I’m a sort of strange, granola, alternative lifestyle freak.  They won’t listen to me.

But maybe you will?  Won’t you please visit Stan’s site at least as a starter?  I’m not selling anything here… nothing to buy on Stan’s site.  I just want your health to improve, and the health of your whole family to improve.

Related Posts & Links:

1.  David Wolfe’s Raw Food Site

2.  The Raw Family Website

3.  Defeat Autism Now!

4.  Food Ingredients and Food Labels

Food Ingredients and Nutrition Labels: What to Look for, What to Avoid

Weight loss and good nutrition is an ever-changing ocean whose waves and trends can be difficult to navigate. It wasn’t too long ago that low-carb diets were all the rage, but in August 2009, the Atkins Nutritionals company filed for bankruptcy in the US and pulled out of Britain. The South Beach Diet continues to be popular (on Amazon.com, five South Beach books rank amongst the top 25 diet books), advocating the “right” balance of carbs, fats, and lean meats. Meanwhile, the so-called “Mediterranean Diet” and the “French Paradox” are gaining ground as popular dieting philosophies.

While each diet teaches its own particular philosophy about how to balance one’s diet between proteins, carbohydrates, fats, and sugars, many people still lack the education they need to read and interpret the nutrition fact labels and the ingredient lists found on supermarket foods. People do tend to read these labels – an American poll in a few years back revealed that 80% of Americans read the nutrition labels. However, in that same poll, over half of those surveyed admitted they did not actually use the nutrition facts label to influence their purchasing decisions. This poll indicates that, perhaps due to the overwhelming number of different (and often contradictory) nutritional philosophies, people are no longer certain as to how to use nutrition data and ingredient lists to make good decisions about their diet.

Without engaging the competing dietary philosophies, however, there are still some common sense decisions consumers can make based on those nutrition labels and ingredient lists. Here’s a look at using nutrition labels and ingredient lists to make healthy eating choices for you and your family.

Check the Ingredient List First: Ingredients to Avoid

If nutrition labels are read 80% of the time, consumers probably read the ingredient lists far less, but this is often the more important information. Not all ingredients are created equally, and in this age of highly processed foods, we’ve grown so used to low-quality ingredients that we have come to accept eating them as somehow inevitable.

But there are definitely some ingredients that are commonly found in our foods that we should certainly avoid. These include, but are not limited to: corn syrup, food dyes, and certain preservatives.

Corn Syrup: Ah, corn syrup. We eat so much of it these days that we can barely remember a time when it wasn’t a part of our diet. From salad dressings and yogurts to soft drinks and fruit juices, virtually any processed food that contains sugar also contains corn syrup. Corn syrup isn’t healthy for us, but even worse is its cheaper to produce derivative: glucose-fructose. Glucose-fructose, also known as high fructose corn syrup by Americans and isoglucose by the British, is a mixture of corn syrups whose glucose has been transformed into fructose, then mixed with pure corn syrup (glucose). The result is a part glucose, part fructose syrup that is cheap and easy to produce.

There’s a laundry list of health problems that result from this ubiquitous food ingredient: obesity, diabetes (and insulin resistance), high blood pressure, and heart disease have all been associated with glucose-fructose in various scientific studies. More recent, conflicting data indicates that perhaps glucose-fructose isn’t as bad as previously thought, but many of these studies have been sponsored by the food and beverage industry, so the results of these studies are dubious at best. As a rule of thumb, avoid corn syrup as much as possible, and especially avoid glucose-fructose.

Food Dyes: Food dyes are in more places than you might think. Most processed or manufactured foods contain at least a few food dyes. Unfortunately, certain food dyes are associated with hyperactivity in children, migraine headaches, and possibly cancer. Once again, the manufactured food industry would have consumers believe that all of the dyes are perfectly safe, but a British study in 2007 demonstrated an undeniable link between between hyperactivity and food additives in children.

One of the dyes that the British study found harmful is quinoline yellow, a dye banned in the United States, Japan, and Australia, but still used in soft drinks, cosmetics, and medications in Canada. Other dyes to watch out for are tartrazine (also known as Yellow 5, banned in Norway and voluntarily phasing out in the UK), allura red (aka FD&C Red 40 and Food Red 17, banned in Denmark, Belgium, Germany, France, Switzerland, Sweden, Austria, and Norway), and sunset yellow (aka FD&C yellow 6 and Orange Yellow S, banned in Norway and Finland).

Preservatives: Like food dyes, certain food additives and preservatives should also be avoided wherever possible. One of these is sodium benzoate, also called E211, a common preservative in salad dressings, jams, fruit juices, and condiments. When sodium benzoate is found together with ascorbic acid (a part of Vitamin C), it can form benzene, a known cancer-causing agent. Furthermore, one researcher out of Britain’s University of Sheffield posits that sodium benzoate, just by itself, can damage the DNA of human cells. DNA damage is associated with various neurological disorders, including Parkinson’s disease.

The press around sodium benzoate has gotten so bad and so convincing that even soft drink giant Coca-Cola decided to phase it out of the Diet Coke formula and its other soft drinks as well, including Sprite and Fanta. Other soft drink companies, such as Pepsi, still use sodium benzoate.

Another food additive to avoid is sodium nitrite, a preservative typically added to lunch meats and smoked fish to keep them from going bad. Many experts call sodium nitrite dangerous. For example, Dr. Christine Gerbstadt of the American Dietetic Association, says sodium nitrite is at “the top of my list of additives to cut from my diet.” Her reason? Under high temperatures, sodium nitrite chemically transforms into a compound known to cause cancer.

Scanning the list of ingredients first makes the nutrition label itself easier to understand. For example, knowing that a food serving has 20 grams of sugar means one thing if the food is a piece of fresh fruit, whose sugars are relatively easy for the body to digest. But it means another thing entirely if those 20 grams come from glucose-fructose, as already discussed. Therefore, read the fine print list of ingredients before reading the nutrition label; without understanding what’s in the food, it’s difficult to accurately interpret the nutrition facts.

Understanding the Nutrition Labels: Serving Sizes and Calories

To read and understand a nutrition label, start at the top with the serving size and servings per container.

One clever trick food manufacturers use is to base nutritional information on a small serving size, making the food seem more innocuous than it actually is. For example, many bottled drinks that most individuals will drink in one sitting over the course of an hour or two actually contain two to three servings. Thus, although the drink may only contain 150 calories per serving, little does the consumer realize that they are actually drinking 2.5 servings, or 375 calories. Likewise, certain snack foods show nutritional information based upon very small quantities, such as 5 or 10 pieces, when most adults are likely to eat two or three times that number in a single sitting.

And what exactly are calories, anyway? To be very specific and technical, one calorie is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of water by one degree. More simply put, calories represent the energy we get from our food.

When we use as many calories as we consume, our weight remains the same. When we burn more calories than we consume, we lose weight. And when we burn fewer calories than we consume, we gain weight.

How Many Calories Should We Eat?

It’s not always the case that “more calories are bad” and “less calories are good”. It actually depends upon the individual, and that individual’s weight goals. Nutrition labels are based on an assumption that most people eat 2,000 to 2,500 calories per day. However, it is entirely likely that a petite female who works in an office-based job, for example, will not need a full 2,000 calories per day, but something more like 1,500 to 1,800.

One handy tool to discover your daily caloric needs is the Daily Needs Calculator on the site NutritionData.com. By entering a few simple facts about your weight and activity level, you can learn how many calories you need every day. The Daily Needs Calculator on NutritionData.com provides the number of required calories to maintain weight. If you need to lose weight, consider ways to make that calorie total smaller.

Calories from Fat and Types of Fat

Next to the listing of calories per serving is another number: “Calories from fat”. Eating fat doesn’t necessarily translate into being fat. In fact, the body requires a certain amount of fat per day for normal functioning – the brain, as one example, is mostly fat.

But not all fat is created equally, and there are some fats which are better for the body than others. Trans fats, for example, are processed fats which tend to raise cholesterol levels and increase the risk of heart disease. Foods that contain trans fats are generally processed foods such as margarine and snack foods. Generally speaking, calories from trans fats should stay at 1% or less of total caloric intake. Trans fats are generally considered to be even worse for the human body than the highly maligned saturated fats.

Omega-6 and Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Known as “essential fatty acids” because they are necessary for normal body function, omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids are the “good fats” needed to support a healthy brain and nervous system. However, what most food manufacturers won’t say about these essential fatty acids is that most of us get plenty of omega-6 fatty acids but not enough omega-3 fatty acids.

The average western diet includes a 10:1 ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids; scientists would prefer that we eat a ratio closer to 4:1 or even less. The current “overdose” of omega-6 fatty acids leads to a variety of problems – stroke, heart disease, and even depression can be related to an imbalance of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids. To correct that ratio, eat more fish or consider taking a fish oil supplement. Cold-pressed flax seed oil contains omega-3s and provides a nice salad dressing alternative (and will help consumers avoid the aforementioned food preservatives and food dyes).

Getting Enough Nutrients?

Scanning further down the nutrition label is a section that isolates a few essential vitamins and minerals, such as vitamin C and iron. But ironically, the one type of food that most often comes with a nutrition label – fresh fruits and vegetables – are the foods most packed with essential nutrients. Some scientists typify the modern westerner as overfed, but undernourished. This undernourishment comes as a result of eating mostly processed foods, which are packed with calories and fats, but contain relatively few vitamins and minerals.

Conclusion: It’s Time to Reverse the Clock

What we can learn from nutrition labels and ingredient lists is that we have gotten too far away from the way we used to eat. All the latest research indicates that as a society we should get away from processed and manufactured foods and go back to eating food the old-fashioned way, before it was mass produced in factories. The best foods for us are fresh, natural foods that do not come pre-packaged in a box. No matter what claims the packaging on a “diet food” may make, for example, simpler meals of fresh fruits, vegetables, and unprocessed meats are far more likely to help us keep a reasonable weight and good health. When you know what to look for, a quick scan of ingredient lists and nutrition labels makes it easy to make healthy choices and evaluate diet trends while armed with common sense.

Related Posts & Links:

1.  Understanding Omega-6 and Omega-3 Fatty Acids

2.  NutritionData.com

3.  Green Smoothie Drinks:  My 14-Day Experiment

Green Jobs and Green Collar Careers: The Future is Downright Sunny

State of the economy got you down?  Considering a career change?  For the time being, consider passing up the blue collars and the white collars, and go for a green collar:  so-called “green collar jobs” may turn out to be the hottest thing since the dot com era.  And this time, unlike all those dot com boom that never produced much of a tangible product and therefore never really had a tangible future, the green job sector is likely to stick around — and grow.

What is a Green Job, Anyway?

With all this talk of “green jobs” and “green collars”, one might stop and ask the question, “But what exactly IS a green job?”  The reason that the green job field seems so vague is that green jobs haven’t yet been completely defined.  In general, you can define a “green job” as any job that does something to benefit the environment.  Therefore, solar panel installers and xeriscaping are green jobs, but so are some university research positions and environmental educators.  CPAs who help manage the accounts at a solar panel manufacturer might be said to have a “light green collar” — that is, a white collar job that has a green tint to it.  Likewise, a general contractor turned weatherizer could have a “blue-green collar”.  Regardless of previous job skills, there’s a place for nearly everyone in the new green economy.

Facts & Figures

Given the broad definition of a “green job”, tracking exact figures on green job growth and projected growth isn’t easy.  But here’s a few facts:

  • Green jobs in Michigan: GM is manufacturing the Chevy Volt (the electric car that plugs into a regular wall socket) in Michigan; over the next ten years, just producing the battery that goes into the Volt is projected to bring 40,000 jobs to Michigan — good news for the troubled state.  An additional 700 green jobs are expected to make it to Michigan thanks to $15.5 million in Recovery Act funds.
  • Green jobs in South Carolina: Another state where the recession has hit hard is South Carolina, where unemployment has recently reached a record high of a whopping 12.1%.  Thanks to the Recovery Act, $98 million is headed to Clemson University in South Carolina to fund a wind energy project.  The project is estimated to bring 20,000 wind energy-related jobs in both the Clemson area and in South Carolina’s low country, where the windmills will actually be installed.
  • LEED Buildings to bring more green jobs: The US Green Building Council, the agency that creates the LEED green building rating systems, predicts that “green building practices” will lead to 7.9 million jobs over the next four years, and contribute over $554 million to the Gross Domestic Product.
  • “Cash for Caulkers”: The latest Obama plan to increase jobs while simultaneously greening the economy is officially called “Homestar”, but is more popularly known by its nickname, “Cash for Caulkers.”  The new proposal would help homeowners pay for weatherization projects.  The plan, which would spend $23 billion over two years, would provide homeowners cash to pay for up to half the cost of their weatherizing project.  Typically, weatherizing a home costs thousands of dollars, while saving homeowners only hundreds per year.  If the homeowner is to stay in the home for ten years or more, then financially the up-front investment makes sense.  But if a homeowner doesn’t expect to stay in a home for that much longer, the financial incentive to weatherize decreases significantly.  This is where Cash for Caulkers would hope to step in.  Suddenly, a major weatherization project would only take five years to pay for itself.  In theory, the program could create a lot of work for contractors in the weatherization business.
  • Weatherization Assistance Program: But wait — there’s more!  Whether Cash for Caulkers passes Congress or not (and it looks like it will), there’s still the Weatherization Assistance Program.  Paid for by Recovery Act funds, this program is designed to help low-income homeowners pay for weatherization projects.  Like Cash for Caulkers, the Weatherization Assistance Program hopes to lower energy bills while creating green jobs for contractors at the same time.

Thanks to all the government investment, green jobs are projected to grow by 52% from 2000 to 2016 (according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics), compared to a 14% job growth rate for all other occupations.  The actual job growth figures may actually be HIGHER, because the Bureau based its statistics only on a few limited green job occupations:  environmental engineers and technicians, environmental scientists and specialists, and environmental protection technicians.  What about all the support staff — the sales people who will be hired to sell solar panels?  The human resources professionals who will be hired to find talent for these growing green companies?  The accountants hired to manage the finances of these green companies?  All of these green jobs — which might be better termed “green support staff” — have not been included in the Bureau’s statistics.

Whether the green job hype will live up to its projections or not depends upon many things, from the appetite of the American people for green products to who’s elected to the next session of Congress.  But in all likelihood, green jobs and the green products these jobs will produce are here to stay and will continue to grow.

Related Posts & Links:

“Green Builders’ Study Forecasts Job Growth” (NY Times)

“A Stimulus that Could Save Money” (NY Times)

Weatherization Assistance Program (US Department of Energy)

From the Inbox: “World Vision Gifts”

Hey folks,

It always warms my heart to hear about organizations trying to do good in ways that are also sustainable.  It’s the whole “give a man to fish” vs. “teach a man to fish” difference.  Here’s the latest that’s landed in my inbox:

Seattle, December 11, 2009 — Self-sustaining living is becoming more and more popular in the U.S. as families seek to save money and reduce their carbon footprint by growing their own vegetables, raising their own livestock and cooking from scratch.  This trend reflects how the majority of people around the world already live. Help improve worldwide sustainability by giving a gift from the 2009 World Vision Gift Catalog. The catalog features more than 100 gifts that truly make a difference for families in need – including gifts that encourage more sustainable living in communities around the world.

A primary World Vision initiative in programs located in rural, farming communities is to invest in long-term agricultural development.  This may include providing seeds and tools to assist farmers in their harvest and training community members in new agricultural techniques (crop rotation, drip irrigation, and planting trees to enrich overworked soil). This helps ensure the community’s food sources are sustainable, and it is also one of the best ways to help communities survive the global food crisis and economic recession.

Sonnie Georgette, a 48-year-old farmer living in Lumata, a village in the southeastern Democratic Republic of Congo, spoke about the impact these sustainable practices had on her community.

“Before the start-up of World Vision in our area, famine was part of the daily life,” Sonnie recalls. “We had to go to buy food 40 kilometers [about 25 miles] away; a very huge number of children were often affected by ‘Kwashiorkor’ [severe protein malnutrition], and food was very expensive…[but now] our life will no longer be the same.”

In fact, Lumata has become so sustainable that World Vision is scheduled to close operations in the area soon, a remarkable achievement considering the former conditions of this community.

Gifts featured in the World Vision Gift Catalog range in price from $17 – $22,000 and can be purchased in the name of a friend, colleague or loved one.  The gift recipient in turn receives a special card describing the gift that was purchased and the impact it will have on the life of a person in need.

This year’s self-sustaining gifts include:
•       An alpaca for warm wool and increased income – $360, or $25 per share
•       Hybrid or drought-resistant seeds for a farmer – $17
•       Clean, safe water for a school – $100 (per share)
•       10 fruit trees to boost health and income – $60
•       Goat and two chickens to provide milk and eggs – $100
•       A bicycle for a young girl to attend school – $85
•       Stock a school in America with essential learning tools and supplies – $100
•       Build and stock a fish pond – $200

For more gift ideas please visit www.worldvisiongifts.org.  Gift Catalogs, product photos and interviews are available upon request.

From the Inbox: “Green House” at USA Today

Hey everyone, here’s another press release from my inbox that I thought might interest you…

USA TODAY LAUNCHES ONLINE COMMUNITY FOCUSED ON GREEN HOMES

“Green House” Is Most Recent Addition to Growing List of Online Communities

McLean, Va. (Dec. 9, 2009) — USA TODAY, the nation’s top-selling print newspaper and a leading online destination, announces the launch of its latest online community, Green House. Moderated by Wendy Koch, the community focuses on simple, attainable steps that readers can take to green their homes and their lives. The community can be found at greenhouse.usatoday.com

A place to learn and share ideas about greening your home, Green House will connect readers with helpful content, focusing on the attainable green steps that you can take.  The community will feature news and insight on the latest green products, books, articles and studies; interviews with architects, builders and others who have tested clever ideas; and tours of homes that have tackled eco-wise projects.

As moderator, Koch will translate the sometimes complicated world of green building for you.  Koch is currently disassembling an old home, salvaging whatever possible and building the greenest home she and her husband can afford. They will also seek top certification from several green-rating programs.

Community members are able to utilize all the social networking functions available on USATODAY.com. These include commenting, messaging authors directly, messaging other members privately, creating blogs, joining a conversation in the forum or creating forums to discuss environmental issues.

Green House is the latest addition to an expanding roster of USA TODAY online communities. Recently created are Kindness, covering the changing spectrum of charity and philanthropy; Drive On, a consumer-oriented site for both auto enthusiasts and everyday Americans who love their cars and trucks; Hotel Check-In, a hotel community targeting business travelers; Game Hunters, with a focus on video games and “interactive awesomeness;” and The Oval, dedicated to tracking the Obama administration.  Several new communities will roll out and re-launch through the spring. All can be seen at communities.usatoday.com.

LEED Buildings: How Much do they Benefit?

LEED, or “Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design”, is a rating system applied to buildings to determine how environmentally-friendly they are.  Conceived in 1998 by the US Green Building Council (USGBC), over 14,000 construction projects in over 30 countries have sought LEED certification.  LEED certification has spawned tax incentives for eco-friendly construction, online training courses tailored to help construction professionals become certified LEED Green Associates, and hot debate over whether the program actually works.  What does the future of LEED look like?  And is it really benefiting our environment?

Some LEED Certified Buildings Use More Energy

The New Buildings Institute, based in Vancouver, WA, found in a 2008 study that a quarter of LEED certified buildings actually use more energy than similar non-LEED buildings.  The study was funded by the EPA and the USGBC itself, and to solve the problem they uncovered, new requirements will soon take effect that requires LEED certified buildings to regularly report on energy and water usage.

One reason that LEED buildings sometimes end up using even more energy is not that the building design is faulty, but that the building occupants do things that the design didn’t expect.  For example, occupants might not change heating system filters, leading to a huge loss of energy over time.  But Tom Hicks, the executive director of the USGBC’s Building Performance Initiative, won’t place the blame on the occupants:  he says these problems come from a lack of understanding of how the building will be used on the part of the designers.

The new insight provides fuel for LEED critics, who have long balked at the way LEED requirements increase construction costs and are unrealistic.  However, the USGBC remains undeterred.  They see the new information as an opportunity to improve their program and its requirements, and believe that in the long run, data will prove that LEED certification requirements save building owners money.

Related Posts & Links:

1.  Green Report:  Holding LEED Up to the Light

For anyone in the DC area…

Hey friends,

This press release found its way to my inbox and I thought those of you who live in the Washington, DC, area might be interested to hear about it.

—–

FROM: GREEN SALON/ GLOBAL CHANGE FOUNDATION
Directors: Peter Fusaro (212) 316-0223 Carmen Cook (212) 222-3775

Request for Coverage 12/9 Event

Leading Washington Attorney/Expert Sheila Hollis to Discuss Politics Of Climate Change
at Next “Green Salon” Event 12/9; Leading Collaborative Artist Mr. Thomas Muraco,
with Met Opera Soprano Mary Dunleavy and Operatic Baritone Philip Cutlip, To Be World-Class Musical Guests

(December 2, 2009)The Green Salon, home of eco-art sages, musicians and earth lovers, will present the next venue in its provocative series of expert speakers and beautiful music, Wednesday, December 9th at Klavierhaus, 211 West 58th Street at 5:30 p.m. This is the 12th venue in an ongoing series of enlightening and fun events featuring music and education on environmental issues.

Washington power attorney Sheila Hollis, a leading expert on climate change legislation, will discuss the politics of climate change. Ms. Hollis is chair of Washington DC the office of Duane Morris LLP. Ms. Hollis has 34 years legal experience, has received multiple awards, including recently being named on e of the 50 Key Women in Energy worldwide. She is known as one of the best in the energy law field. She has chaired the American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy and Resources of over 14,000 attorneys. She is an expert in climate change legislation.

The evening will have an extra-special musical portion. As a cultural punctuation to the stimulating intellectual discussion, Mr. Thomas Muraco, internationally renowned accompanist, will perform. Mr. Muraco is on the faculty of the Manhattan School of Music where he coaches, teaches and conducts operas. Richard Dyer of the Boston Globe said that he “is simply one of the finest collaborative artists before the public today. His contributions were model of complete support and specific understanding–they were songs without words.” He has collaborated with major artists and performed with major orchestras. He created the evening’s program with Mary Dunleavy, distinguished Metropolitan Opera soprano and Philip Cutlip distinguished operatic baritone, both with major international careers. The music and singing is world class.

The Green Salon series is presented by Peter C. Fusaro, visionary, best-selling author, founder of the Wall Street Green Trading Summit, international keynote speaker and respected thought leader; and Carmen Cook, Juilliard graduate, and cultural entrepreneur with a diverse background in the arts, business and social activism. The Green Salon series had its inaugural event on September 18th, 2008. Each program at Klavierhaus will present an artist and speaker. Speaker topics will include greening buildings, advances in biofuels, water as a commodity, renewable energy, clean tech, solar energy, photovoltaic, green investing and more. Tickets to The Green Salon event are $20 and are tax deductible, available online at www.global-changefoundation.com. Call 212-222-3775 for questions.

WHAT: Green Salon Arts/ Eco-Social Presentation

WHO: Hosted by visionary Peter Fusaro and Juilliard graduate/social entrepreneur Carmen Cook; Washington power attorney Sheila Hollis will discuss the politics of climate change legislation; music by Manhattan Music School opera teacher/world-class accompanist Thomas Muraco, along with Metropolitan Opera Soprano Mary Dunleavy and Philip Cutlip, World-Class Distinguished Operatic Baritone.

WHERE: Klavierhaus, 211 W. 58th Street, New York, NY

WHEN: Wednesday, December 9th at 5:30 PM

###

GOVERNANCE & ACCOUNTABILITY INSTITUTE, INC.
STRATEGISTS | RESEARCH | MONITORING | ADVISORY SERVICES

Specialists in ESG / Sustainability Factors for Corporate Managers and Investment Professionals (Environmental – Social – Governance Indicators)
Sales Office: 215 Park Avenue South, 10th Floor, New York, New York 10003 | Technology Center: 90 Second Street,  Mineola, New York 11501
Tel 516.248.2383 | New York Tel 646.454.0577 |  Fax 516.248.4045 | info@ga-institute.com
|  www.ga-institute.com

How Much Trash Do You Make?

How much do you throw away each day?  Between all those banana peels and coffee grinds, foil and plastic wrapping on your Christmas presents, how much and how fast do you contribute to your local landfill?

Not sure?  Most people have no idea how much trash they produce.  Here are a few figures to get you thinking:

  • According to the University of Colorado at Boulder, the average American throws away 600 times their adult weight in a lifetime.  That amounts to 90,000 lbs. of trash left behind on our planet for each American.
  • Furthermore, we Americans fill up 63,000 garbage trucks each and every day.  If you lined them up end-to-end, they would stretch out for 400 miles.
  • In a year, each American produces about 1,600 lbs. of garbage (that’s about 4.4 lbs. of trash per day, folks!)
  • When it comes to cling wrap, we use enough plastic wrap to cover the state of Texas in a year.

Reduce!  Reuse!  Recycle!

Did you know that 95% of the plastic the world produces ends up in landfills or in the ocean?  It doesn’t have to be this way.  Sure, there will be corners of the world that will take a looooooong time to figure out that it’s important to recycle, but your home and your office doesn’t need to be one of those corners.  You’re educated.  You care enough about the environment that you’re reading this.  So make it a point to recycle all the plastic you use, and reduce how much non-recyclable plastic you buy in the first place.